Skip to main content

The sick monk

A young monk was staying in a monastery. He had come to sit in the presence of an old sage but within a few days he felt that the old man did not know anything at all. Listening to the same things every day he got fed up. He thought that he should leave this monastery and search somewhere else for another master. This was not the place for him. 

But on the day he was to leave, another monk visited the monastery.  That night the inmates of the monastery gathered and they talked about many things. The new monk was very knowledgeable about so many things, very subtle and perceptive, very deep and very intense, and the young monk thought that this was how a master should be. Within two hours the new monk had mesmerized everyone. The young monk thought that the old master must be feeling a lot of pain and very depressed that he was so old and yet had not learnt anything, while this newcomer knew so much. 

After two hours, when the talks were over, the guest monk looked at the old master and asked, ”How did you like my talks?” 

The old man said, ”My talks? You were talking, but none of it was your own. I was listening very intently for you to say something but you did not say anything at all!” 

The guest monk replied, ”If it was not me talking then who has been talking for the past two hours?” 

The old man said, ”If you ask for my truthful and authentic opinion, then books and scriptures were talking from inside you, but you were not talking at all. You did not even say a single word. You were throwing out, vomiting out, whatever you have gathered. And because of your vomiting I became afraid that you are a very sick person. For two hours you went on vomiting whatever was collected in your stomach and you filled the whole room with dirt and stink. I did not smell even a little fragrance of knowledge because anything which is taken in from the outside and again thrown out is certain to have the stink of vomiting. You did not say anything yourself; not a single word was your own.” 

After listening to the old sage, the young monk who had wanted to leave the monastery decided to stay. That day, for the first time, he came to know that there are different kinds of knowing. One kind of knowing is that which we collect from outside and another kind of knowing is that which arises from within. Whatever we collect from the outside becomes a bondage, it does not liberate us – we are liberated by that which comes from the inside.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

pauranika sandhya vandanam

THE DAILY SANDHYA FOR ALL HINDUS  Preparation *. One should rise early and perform the ablutions. *. Wear clean a clean dhoti and uttariya (upper garment worn with the right shoulder exposed). like this : 4. A tilaka [dot] should be made on the forehead made with sandal paste or clay. 5.Sit on a mat facing the east in the morning and west in the evening with the paƱcapatra (a vessel or water with a spoon) and a tray. 2. acamanam  *Sipping of water for physical, mental and verbal sanctification. * Water is taken holding the uddharini (spoon) in the left hand and pouring it into the palm of the right hand. The water is then sipped from the base of the palm while reciting the following mantras; om acyutaya namaha     sip water from the brahma tirtha of right hand om anantaya namaha     sip water again om govindaya namaha   sip water again 3. Anga-nyasam • Touch the various parts of the body indicated with the right hand,

Act of sex in detail

As we discussed it in last post about sexuality in general with rules and regulations . The reason why i am posting is because if i don't reveal these secrets one would easily fall into wrong info circulated in name of  kamasutra. Here i would discuss the act more explicitly ,so viewer discretion is been adviced . so last time i said there are 3 body types of male according to books and 3 body types of female but ananga ranga and rati rahasya also states that there are 4 body types of female : padmini,shankhini, chitrini and hastini which get further categorised as mrigi,ashvini  and karini . These are general judments of physique so nearest body type according to category can be alloted because you usually won't get these exact body shapes . so proper judement should be done with respect to body type. So i would consider types of women and men then i would go towards  Act of copulation according to body types and the act . This info contains

Is prophet muhammad really mentioned in the vedas ?

prophet muhammad is mentioned in the vedas is claimed  by mr zakir naik alone . His excited dumb followers as well as some dumb sickular Hindus accepted his statements without even cross checking the statements . some Quotations which mr naik exploits is Rig veda 1.13.3 ,1.53.9 and  5.5.2 yajurveda 20.37  there are many more verses like these but here mr naik delibrately chose to exploit is the word ( nara shamsaha which means praised by men) he quotes all the verses in which narashamsa is been mentioned and misleads people by saying its prophet muhammad. vedas contain hymns and verses for devas like  indra ,vayu ,agni etc and there is no specific mention of muhammad . look at the following hymns rig veda 1.13.3 narasamsamhiha priyamasminajna upahvaye | madhujihvat haviskrtam || i kindle the fire in this yagna which is beloved and benificient to people ,the sweet tounged and in which obligations are put. rig veda  5.5.2 narasamsah susudatimm yajnamadabhyah |